Becoming Christians

7 Jan

There’s an interesting idea that I find myself daydreaming about off an on.  It’s the idea that none of us are Christians, instead we are all becoming Christians.  At first glance this may seem like nothing more than a slippery semantic twist.  ”Oh I get it” you say to me with a knowing wink, “we say we’re not Christians but we really are. We just say we’re not, so people will think we’re humble.”  To that I would reply, “Nope. It’s not really humility as much as an acknowledgement of the reality that as human beings we’re an awfully mixed bag.”

There’s a big theological word called “sanctification” that basically says we are works in progress.  We are literally becoming saved.  Doesn’t Paul say something about working out our salvation with fear and trembling?  I think somewhere in our evangelical scramble to assure everyone that they’re really saved and going to heaven we lost this idea that it’s a process.  We’re on a journey.  We’re literally becoming Christians.

Next time someone asks if you’re a Christian I think an interesting answer would be “Nope, but I hope to be someday.”  Not to be tricky or evasive but to be more honest about the reality of our religious lives.

10 Responses to “Becoming Christians”

  1. Jen 07. Jan, 2010 at 7:24 am #

    Totally agree with you, Brett! I love the word process. It implies a slower, attainable pace that feels more doable!

  2. Brandon 09. Jan, 2010 at 4:35 pm #

    I really enjoyed that my friend good post!

  3. Brett 09. Jan, 2010 at 9:27 pm #

    Thanks guys. Glad you enjoyed it!

  4. Kyle Steed 09. Jan, 2010 at 9:54 pm #

    I agree that our lives as “christians” are ones of being transformed and renewed daily. And that our life is a process of working out our salvation. That’s scriptural. But I would also agree that we are called son of god and can stand on that truth now, wherever we are in our walk. Plus I like thinking of myself as a son instead of a christian. There’s less stress that comes with knowing I don’t have to try so hard to get the approval of my Dad who loves me for who I am.

  5. Philip Davis 09. Jan, 2010 at 10:57 pm #

    I like this a lot, here are my two cents –

    I think it’s important to note that there is a difference between sanctification and justification.

    Justification is the change of the believing sinner’s standing (status) before God, declaring him/her accepted, with the guilt and penalty of his/her sins done away with. Sanctification on the other hand is the continual growing in holiness. I would consider anyone who is Justified a Christian, sanctification (and Glorification) come after this justification. Or so Romans would have me believe.

    I think think that the term Christian coming from the Greek simply means follower of Christ (His teachings ect.) Which is what I consider myself. Interesting thoughts though.

    Thanks for the thought out article, I enjoyed it!

  6. Robbie 10. Jan, 2010 at 8:10 pm #

    Yeah man totally agree it’s a process just like life!

  7. Zander Leeke 11. Jan, 2010 at 8:00 pm #

    Why don’t you have any scriptures cited proving your belief? You mention Paul talking about working out our salvation with fear and trembling, but you never cite the actual verse. Could you? We can’t make theological statements based on what we think, we have to use the Bible to prove that it is the truth.

  8. Joel 13. Jan, 2010 at 10:04 am #

    I like the heart of this . . . but it depends a lot on what we mean by “Christian” in the first place. There are lots of other reasons I wonder whether I want to be called a “Christian” and, frankly, it’s something I might rather be moving from than toward.

    Even if we take an idealized sense of the term, it still implies the fact that we are following, emulating, like, in the image of–indeed, I’d say that it already contains an implicit sense of becoming. That is, “diminutive” and “imperfect” are built in.

    Moreover, I’m of the opinion that Jesus Himself is both moving and changing (which, I guess, doesn’t preclude the idea of becoming whatever Christian is; it just makes it a moving target).

    Another aspect is that both we and Jesus are singular in our creation. I will never be anything that transcends the nature of Christ, but I would argue that I was created for a purpose that a Jesus clone would not have been suited to. That begs the question of what exactly it means to be “like Christ” and whether there’s maybe a subset of attributes that leaves alone that unique identity and calling.

    In any case, we will never really be Christ and maybe we aren’t intended to be. And in the ways that we are meant to be–in our righteousness and in our standing before the Father–He says that we are.

    And is the Kingdom itself now are coming? If both (as I believe), then I’d say so is our status as “Christians.”

    Speaking of movement, even if we assume a static Christ, the point of the journey isn’t merely that we are moving closer to an ideal, but closer in intimacy. Am I not yet married because my love for my wife is not yet perfected?

    But, again, a lot depends on exactly what we mean by “Christian.” And even if we mean a certain thing, it matters to a great extent what others mean by it to.

    Speaking of definitions, let’s consider “saved.” As I contemplate the ontological realities, I have to conclude that I conclusively have been saved (that is, it’s a completed act). That doesn’t necessarily mean that I’m not also continuing to be saved. More importantly (to me, because I think that this is something most Christians miss in our reading of Scripture and in our crafting of systemic theologies), my being saved and having been saved don’t negate the fact that new crises arise daily (both essential, relational, spiritual ones and less significant, incidental ones) from which I must also be saved; I have been saved, I am being saved and I will repeatedly be saved. What’s ironic is that most Evangelical theologies distinguish between salvation and justification (which are generally considered to be accomplished acts) on the one hand and sanctification (which is most often seen as an on-going process, though there are some theologies that view it as an event) on the other; the irony is that it sounds like we might agree that this is problematic and/or arbitrary even though it also sounds like we disagree about the nature of salvation.

    And, of course, this raises a ton of other questions too, but I have to stop somewhere. :-)

  9. Joel 13. Jan, 2010 at 10:08 am #

    That should be “now or coming” not “now are coming” (in the sixth paragraph). Argh, and the final “to” should be “too” in the eighth.

  10. Brett 14. Jan, 2010 at 6:32 am #

    Hey Kyle, Thanks for stopping by! I agree that thinking of ourselves as part of the family of God can be a powerful thing. Ultimately though those are just metaphors that are grasping at spiritual realities that are beyond our explanation. It’s a bit of a paradox to think of ourselves as being in the family and yet still becoming part of the family- but somehow that seems to be the “already, not yet” reality we live with.

    Hey Philip, glad you chimed in. Good thoughts on justification. I agree with your working definitions there however, I wonder if instead of splitting those two things apart so much we should embrace them as more of a paradox. I think Joel explained it well in his follow up comments.

    Robbie, glad you enjoyed it!

    Hey Zander, did any verses come to your mind? Ultimately, my hope was that people would be provoked to deeper reflection – not necessarily to prove that I know alot of verses that make my point beyond all reasonable doubt. I hope that makes sense. The verse I hinted at in my post was Philippians 2:12. Thanks man!

    Joel, I realize the word “Christian” is a tricky one for many people (myself included). You’ve given me alot to think about. I think you’re last paragraph is getting to the heart of my post in many ways. Thank you for chiming in.

Leave a Reply